Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
Noyes Law Office, P.C. Get back on the road to freedom!
  • Get Back On The Road To Freedom!
  • ~
  • Free No Obligation Consultation

Can I Have Multiple Employers for Purposes of Workers’ Compensation?

WorkAccident

Workers’ compensation is considered the “exclusive remedy” under Iowa law for employees to seek compensation from their employers for a work-related injury. In other words, you cannot file a personal injury lawsuit against your company if you are already receiving workers’ compensation benefits. The law is designed to guarantee employees receive medical and wage replacement benefits without the need for extensive litigation.

Federal Court Holds Truck Driver “Mentor” Cannot Be Sued by Injured Apprentice

As a general rule, the exclusive remedy of workers’ compensation only applies to your employer and not to any third parties. Let’s say you were driving a company-owned vehicle on a work-related matter. Another driver runs a red light and slams into you. You could still sue the negligent driver for damages, as workers’ compensation only protects your employer.

But there are other scenarios where a third party may be classified as a “joint employer” for workers’ compensation purposes. The U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, which oversees appeals from Iowa’s federal courts, recently addressed such a case. In Quiles v. Johnson, the plaintiff (Quiles) was an apprentice commercial truck driver for Swift Transportation, an Arizona-based company. As part of his training, the plaintiff was assigned to a “mentor”–the defendant (Johnson), who was an experienced truck driver working as an independent contractor for Swift.

While driving on I-80 through Iowa, the defendant “fell asleep at the wheel” and drove his tractor-trailer off the road, according to court records. The plaintiff was “off-duty in the truck’s sleeper berth” at the time. The plaintiff subsequently received workers’ compensation benefits from Swift. He then filed a separate personal injury lawsuit against the defendant.

Unfortunately, both the trial court and the Eighth Circuit held that Iowa law barred the plaintiff’s personal injury claim, as the defendant was also legally the plaintiff’s “employer” for workers’ compensation purposes. The appeals court explained it is possible for an employee “to have more than one employer” for workers’ compensation purposes. And although Iowa law presumes there is only one employer, that presumption can be overcome if there is sufficient evidence of a “joint” employment situation.

Here, the plaintiff “performed closely related services for both Swift and [the defendant].” And the defendant actually made contributions to Swift to defray the costs of purchasing workers’ compensation insurance to cover the plaintiff. Furthermore, through his own actions the plaintiff clearly established the existence of an apprenticeship relationship with the defendant–and Iowa workers’ compensation law expressly recognizes apprenticeships as a “contract of service” performed “for an employer.”

Speak with a Fairfield, Iowa Workers’ Compensation Lawyer Today

Workers’ compensation often serves to protect the interests of employers at the expense of injured workers. This is why it is important to work with an experienced Southeast Iowa workers’ compensation lawyer if you are faced with a claim that potentially involves multiple employers. Contact the Noyes Law Office, P.C., at 641-472-3236 to schedule a free, no-obligation consultation with a member of our legal team today.

Source:

scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4335221824286636876

  • $1 Million
    Truck vs. auto case. Policy limits a 35 year old married mother of two killed.
  • $812 Thousand
    Rear-End Motor Vehicle Accident
  • $650 Thousand
    Settlement for spouse of deceased worker.
  • $575 Thousand
    Premises Liability Settlement
  • $500 Thousand
    Auto accident settlement with resulting post-concussive head complications (no wage loss).
  • $350 Thousand
    Injury from work with complications after surgery.
  • $300 Thousand
    Policy limits for 88 year old man rear ended.
  • $190 Thousand
    Read-End Accident with Tinitus Diagnosis.
  • $180 Thousand
    Slip and fall with a broken arm and torn rotator cuff.
  • $190 Thousand
    Bilateral carpal tunnel injury- $135,000 against the employer and $55,000 against the Second Injury Fund.
  • $185 Thousand
    Injured back.
  • $175 Thousand
    Broken leg of a 67 year old.
  • $160 Thousand
    Broken hip of 83 year old woman.
  • $155 Thousand
    Non-displaced fractured hip.
  • $100 Thousand
    Aggravation of degeneration disk disease.
  • Previous
  • Next

Get Back On The Road To Freedom!

Free No Obligation Consultation

Our Southeast Iowa personal injury, workers compensation and bankruptcy attorneys serve clients in Fairfield, Ottumwa, Mt. Pleasant, Iowa City, Knoxville, Oskaloosa, Fort Madison, Muscatine, Keosauqua, Birmingham, Centerville, Bloomfield, Keokuk, Sigourney, Richland, Burlington, Washington & Columbus Junction.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation