Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
Noyes Law Office, P.C. Get back on the road to freedom!
  • Get Back On The Road To Freedom!
  • ~
  • Free No Obligation Consultation

How Can Iowa’s “Comparative Fault” Rule Affect the Outcome of a Personal Injury Lawsuit?

CarAccident2

Iowa follows a modified comparative negligence rule in personal injury cases. What does this mean in practice? Basically, if two drivers are involved in an auto accident, and one driver ends up suing the other for damages, the judge jury has to apportion relative fault between the two parties. The plaintiff driver can then only recover damages if their fault was 50 percent or less. And even then, the defendant’s recovery is offset to account for the plaintiff’s share of the fault.

Rural Postal Carrier Found Not At-Fault for Collision with Motorcyclist

Because of this rule, a defendant has every incentive to try and shift blame for the accident to the plaintiff. Take this recent case from a federal magistrate judge here in Iowa, Kleckner v. United States. This case involved an auto accident between a motorcyclist and a vehicle operated by a rural mail carrier for the United States Postal Service.

It should be noted that while most personal injury cases are tried in state court, this one was heard in federal court because the United States government was the defendant. Federal law allows such personal injury claims to be tried applying the law of the state where the accident took place. So Iowa law governed the outcome of the trial, which was held before the magistrate judge with the consent of both sides.

The basic facts of the accident were not in dispute. One afternoon in May 2014, the plaintiff was traveling west on Iowa State Highway 64 between Sabula and Miles. A postal service vehicle, driven by a man named Smith, was making deliveries along IA-64. Coincidentally, the accident took place just as Smith happened to be turning into his own driveway, as he was returning home for lunch. As Smith turned left into the driveway, the plaintiff’s motorcycle “collided with the left site” of Smith’s delivery vehicle.

What was in dispute was who caused the collision. The plaintiff said he assumed Smith was delivering mail to the mailbox, which was located on the right side of the road. The plaintiff therefore decided to pass Smith on the left lane, which required him to cross the double-yellow line in the middle of IA-64. The plaintiff said he had no idea Smith intended to turn left into the driveway, as Smith did not have his left-turn signal flashing.

Smith disputed this. He maintained his left turn signal was on the from the moment he left the previous mailbox on his route until he reached his driveway. Smith also testified that it was his practice to travel on the gravel shoulder of IA-64 when making deliveries, and he was on the road itself when making the turn home.

Ultimately, the magistrate judge found Smith’s account, and the government’s overall case, persuasive. Critically, the court determined that the plaintiff violated Iowa traffic laws by crossing a double-yellow line and failing to keep his motorcycle under control. In other words, even if “some percentage of fault” could be attributed to Smith, there was no question the plaintiff’s comparative fault was at least 51 percent–so he could recover nothing under Iowa law.

Speak with an Iowa Car Accident Attorney Today

When you are involved in an auto accident, do not assume that just because you think the other driver was at-fault that means your own actions will not be challenged in court. This is why it is crucial to work with an experienced Southeast Iowa auto accidents lawyer who can assist you in fully investigating the circumstances surrounding your case. Contact the Noyes Law Office, P.C., to schedule a consultation with a member of our team today.

Source:

scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1975666766390361611

https://www.noyeslawoffice.com/do-you-have-uninsured-motorist-coverage/

  • $1 Million
    Truck vs. auto case. Policy limits a 35 year old married mother of two killed.
  • $812 Thousand
    Rear-End Motor Vehicle Accident
  • $650 Thousand
    Settlement for spouse of deceased worker.
  • $575 Thousand
    Premises Liability Settlement
  • $500 Thousand
    Auto accident settlement with resulting post-concussive head complications (no wage loss).
  • $350 Thousand
    Injury from work with complications after surgery.
  • $300 Thousand
    Policy limits for 88 year old man rear ended.
  • $190 Thousand
    Read-End Accident with Tinitus Diagnosis.
  • $180 Thousand
    Slip and fall with a broken arm and torn rotator cuff.
  • $190 Thousand
    Bilateral carpal tunnel injury- $135,000 against the employer and $55,000 against the Second Injury Fund.
  • $185 Thousand
    Injured back.
  • $175 Thousand
    Broken leg of a 67 year old.
  • $160 Thousand
    Broken hip of 83 year old woman.
  • $155 Thousand
    Non-displaced fractured hip.
  • $100 Thousand
    Aggravation of degeneration disk disease.
  • Previous
  • Next

Get Back On The Road To Freedom!

Free No Obligation Consultation

Our Southeast Iowa personal injury, workers compensation and bankruptcy attorneys serve clients in Fairfield, Ottumwa, Mt. Pleasant, Iowa City, Knoxville, Oskaloosa, Fort Madison, Muscatine, Keosauqua, Birmingham, Centerville, Bloomfield, Keokuk, Sigourney, Richland, Burlington, Washington & Columbus Junction.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation