Skip to main content

Exit WCAG Theme

Switch to Non-ADA Website

Accessibility Options

Select Text Sizes

Select Text Color

Website Accessibility Information Close Options
Close Menu
Noyes Law Office, P.C. Get back on the road to freedom!
  • Get Back On The Road To Freedom!
  • ~
  • Free No Obligation Consultation

What Happens When a Creditor Ignores a Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Discharge Order?

Bank1

Chapter 7 bankruptcy is designed to allow Iowa residents and businesses to discharge their outstanding debts. A discharge means the debtor is legally released from any further obligation to pay the debt. Just as important, the discharge also prevents a creditor from taking any further legal action to collect the debt. If the creditor subsequently ignores the discharge order and continues collection activity, the bankruptcy court may hold the creditor in civil contempt.

U.S. Supreme Court Clarifies Civil Contempt Rules

The United States Supreme Court recently clarified, however, that a creditor is only in civil contempt if “there is no fair ground of doubt” that the discharge order in question actually “barred the creditor’s conduct.”

Here is what led the Court to that decision. The petitioner in this case owned part of a company based in Oregon. The company sued the petitioner in Oregon state court, accusing him of breaching the business’ operating agreement. Before the case was heard, however, the petitioner decided to file for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which stayed (delayed) the state litigation.

After a federal bankruptcy court issued a discharge order, the state court issued a judgment in favor of the company on its breach of contract claim. Of course, this judgment was now unenforceable due to the bankruptcy discharge. But the company still asked for–and received–a separate order awarding it attorney fees incurred after the petitioner filed for bankruptcy.

The petitioner then asked the bankruptcy court to hold the company in civil contempt. The company maintained its actions were justified under a known exception to the discharge rule. After extended litigation, a federal appeals court decided the company had a “good faith belief” the discharge order did not apply to its earlier request for attorney fees, and therefore it was not in civil contempt.

The Supreme Court agreed to the petitioner’s request to review the appeals court’s decision. In a unanimous ruling, the justices agreed the lower court applied the wrong legal standard. Justice Stephen Breyer, writing for the Court, explained that the “good faith” test would allow creditors to violate discharge orders even if their belief the order did not apply to them was “unreasonable.” At the same time, Breyer declined to adopt the “strict liability” standard supported by the petitioner.

Instead, the Court said that in bankruptcy cases going forward, a civil contempt finding is justified “when the creditor violates a discharge order based on an objectively unreasonable understanding of the discharge order or the statutes that govern its scope.”

Speak with an Iowa Bankruptcy Lawyer Today

Even when a bankruptcy discharge order is clear, some creditors may still refuse to get the message. This is why it is important to work with an experienced Southeast Iowa Chapter 7 bankruptcy attorney when dealing with creditors. Contact the Noyes Law Office today if you are thinking about filing for bankruptcy and need legal advice on what steps to take next.

Source:

supremecourt.gov/opinions/18pdf/18-489_p8k0.pdf

https://www.noyeslawoffice.com/the-consequences-of-lying-in-a-chapter-7-bankruptcy-case/

  • $1 Million
    Truck vs. auto case. Policy limits a 35 year old married mother of two killed.
  • $812 Thousand
    Rear-End Motor Vehicle Accident
  • $650 Thousand
    Settlement for spouse of deceased worker.
  • $575 Thousand
    Premises Liability Settlement
  • $500 Thousand
    Auto accident settlement with resulting post-concussive head complications (no wage loss).
  • $350 Thousand
    Injury from work with complications after surgery.
  • $300 Thousand
    Policy limits for 88 year old man rear ended.
  • $190 Thousand
    Read-End Accident with Tinitus Diagnosis.
  • $180 Thousand
    Slip and fall with a broken arm and torn rotator cuff.
  • $190 Thousand
    Bilateral carpal tunnel injury- $135,000 against the employer and $55,000 against the Second Injury Fund.
  • $185 Thousand
    Injured back.
  • $175 Thousand
    Broken leg of a 67 year old.
  • $160 Thousand
    Broken hip of 83 year old woman.
  • $155 Thousand
    Non-displaced fractured hip.
  • $100 Thousand
    Aggravation of degeneration disk disease.
  • Previous
  • Next

Get Back On The Road To Freedom!

Free No Obligation Consultation

Our Southeast Iowa personal injury, workers compensation and bankruptcy attorneys serve clients in Fairfield, Ottumwa, Mt. Pleasant, Iowa City, Knoxville, Oskaloosa, Fort Madison, Muscatine, Keosauqua, Birmingham, Centerville, Bloomfield, Keokuk, Sigourney, Richland, Burlington, Washington & Columbus Junction.

Skip footer and go back to main navigation