Close Menu
Southeast Iowa Personal Injury Attorneys
  • Auto Injury?
  • Injured At Work?
  • Debt Relief?

Get Back On The Road To Freedom!

Free No Obligation Consultation

Local: 641-472-3236

Toll Free: 800-875-7148

  • Facebook
  • Twitter

When Can I Discharge a Student Loan in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy?

StudentDebt

Chapter 7 bankruptcy is designed to give Iowa debtors a “fresh start” by discharging their legal obligation to repay most of their unsecured debts. Unfortunately, one of the biggest sources of personal debt–student loans–enjoys special protections under federal bankruptcy law. As a general rule, a debtor cannot discharge a student loan unless they can prove to the bankruptcy court that forcing them to repay the debt would impose an “undue hardship.”

Looking at the “Totality of the Circumstances”

But how exactly do you prove an “undue hardship”? In many parts of the country, federal courts use what is called the “Brunner test,” which requires the debtor to prove that repaying their student loans would force them to live below a “minimal standard” of living. Iowa, however, falls within the jurisdiction of the U.S. Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals, which has imposed a different legal test that mandates the bankruptcy court consider the “totality of the circumstances” surrounding the debtor. Basically, this means that Iowa bankruptcy judges must look at three things:

  • the debtor’s past, current, and likely future “financial resources”;
  • the debtor’s “reasonable and necessary” living expenses; and
  • any other fact or circumstance the court deems relevant to a particular case.

Note that the burden of proof is still on the debtor to show why they are entitled to an “undue hardship” discharge of a student loan. This is a high bar to clear. But it is still possible to satisfy the Eighth Circuit’s tests and obtain a student loan discharge.

For example, an Iowa bankruptcy judge recently discharged approximately $230,000 in outstanding student loan debt owed by a 50-year-old woman. The debtor obtained several degrees, including a law degree, in the late 1980s and early 1990s. In 1993, she consolidated her outstanding student loans into a single loan with a balance, at the time, of just under $49,000.

Although the debtor worked for about three years as a lawyer in the 1990s, she has struggled to find work since the 2008 financial crisis. She continued to make student loan payments until approximately 2008, most of which went to interest rather than principal. Currently, the debtor is at-home caring for her two adult children, who have special needs. The debtor’s husband, who earns about $40,000 per year in pre-tax income, supports the family.

Under the “totality of the circumstances,” the judge decided forcing the debtor to repay her remaining student loan debt would impose an “undue hardship.” The judge noted the plaintiff has made an honest effort to find work, but given she is now in her 50s and has “large gaps in employment,” it is “unlikely” she will ever earn enough money “to make any substantial payments on or reduction in her student loan balance.”

The judge also found the plaintiff’s husband did not currently earn enough for the family to meet its “reasonably necessary” expenses for food, which further weighed in favor of an undue hardship discharge. And even though the lender offered to defer future student loan payments until the plaintiff could earn more money, the judge said the “mental and emotional impact on the debtor,” not to mention potentially disastrous tax consequences, also weighed in favor of discharge.

Get Advice from an Iowa Bankruptcy Lawyer Today

It is important to emphasize that the case discussed above is the exception and not the rule. Bankruptcy courts only grant undue hardship discharges of student loan debt in rare circumstances. So if you are faced with mounting student loans and need advice on what to do next, you should contact a Southeast Iowa Chapter 7 bankruptcy attorney right away. Call the Noyes Law Office, P.C. today at 641-472-3236 or 800-875-7148 to schedule a free consultation.

Source:

scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3655674117261518499

Share This Page:
  • $1

    Million

    Wrongful death. A 35 year old married mother of two killed.

  • $650

    Thousand

    Settlement for spouse of deceased worker.

  • $575

    Thousand

    Confidential Premises Liability Settlement.

  • $500

    Thousand

    Auto accident with resulting post-concussive head complications.


  • $350

    Thousand

    Injury from work with complications after surgery.

  • $300

    Thousand

    88 year old man rear ended.


  • $190

    Thousand

    Workers Compensation Settlememt. Bilateral carpal tunnel injury.

  • $190

    Thousand

    Read-End Accident with Tinitus Diagnosis.

  • $185

    Thousand

    Injured back.


  • $180

    Thousand

    Workers Compensation and PI Settlement. Slip and Fall with a broken arm and torn rotator cuff

  • $175

    Thousand

    Slip and Fall. Broken leg of a 67 year old.


  • $160

    Thousand

    Slip and Fall. Broken hip of 83 year old woman.


  • $155

    Thousand

    Non-displaced fractured hip.


  • $100

    Thousand

    Aggravation of degeneration disk disease.


  • $97

    Thousand

    Bilateral carpal tunnel.


  • $85

    Thousand

    32 year old man hit while on moped. Contusion resulting in chronic regional pain syndrome.


  • $80

    Thousand

    Fractured wrist and sprained back.


  • $75

    Thousand

    Car vs. Pedestrian. Policy limits for sprained knee.


Contact Form Tab